Introduction
There are occasions when an employee arrives at work with a noticeable scent of alcohol, which should not be ignored. In such cases, immediate termination of employment may not be the most prudent response, despite appearing justified at first glance, as there may be underlying issues that warrant further investigation.
Company policies
It is advisable that a company should have a clearly communicated policy regarding alcohol consumption during working hours, both on and off company premises. Alcohol policies are typically tailored to each company’s specific requirements and standards due to their unique circumstances. If a company lacks a policy, it does not mean that alcohol consumption is permissible. Legislation exists that prevents alcohol consumption during working hours, and having an alcohol policy would benefit the company by reducing the complexity of these matters. Notably, such a policy can fairly discriminate between the rules governing employees with different work requirements.
Policies should not be so strict that employees with concerns are too fearful to come forward and seek assistance for fear of dismissal.
Legislation
Reference can be made to Item 10 of Schedule 8 of the Labour Relations Act, which states that alcoholism and drug abuse are not forms of misconduct but instead forms of incapacity. Consequently, applying a company’s disciplinary code can conflict with this legislation.
Schedule 8 of the Labour Relations Act recommends that in cases where it is known or suspected that an employee is dependent on alcohol or drugs, the situation should be addressed as an incapacity issue rather than through a misconduct procedure. The employer needs to attempt to assist the employee in actively overcoming their dependency. This approach should only be taken if it is clear that the employee wishes to be rehabilitated, which increases the likelihood of success.
Employee support
If, according to the alcohol policy, an employee completes a rehabilitation programme and then relapses, the programme does not need to be repeated. Instead, a fair dismissal procedure can be initiated. It is essential to focus on assisting both parties involved.
The key question is: when should assistance be offered, and when should it not? A meeting involving all parties can be arranged. If the employee insists there is no problem and requests to cease further discussion on the issue, the employer can acknowledge this statement and act accordingly. However, if the issue is not addressed as previously stated, the appropriate procedures can be followed. Conversely, if the employee shows a reasonable chance of success and the need for help, rehabilitation may be offered. During the period of rehabilitation, it will be on a no-pay basis.
Conclusion
Companies are advised to keep all policies current and ensure that employees are thoroughly informed and trained regarding these policies, thus eliminating any uncertainty. Consequently, companies should actively promote adherence to these established policies.
Source: www.golegal.co.za | Provided by SchoemanLaw Inc
For questions or advise, please contact the Cofesa national helpline:
(t): 011 679 4373
(c): 072 341 3382 | 082 656 4957
(e): karenbellcofesa@hotmail.com | etienne@cofesa.co.za
The information and material published on this website is provided for general purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. We make every effort to ensure that the content is updated regularly and to offer the most current and accurate information. Readers are advised to always consult with a Labour Law Practitioner before acting on the information. We accept no responsibility for any loss or damage, whether direct or consequential, which may arise from reliance on the information contained in these pages.