Can I dismiss an employee for absenteeism in South Africa?

Understanding unauthorised absence in the workplace

One of the most disruptive issues an employer can face is when an employee fails to report for duty without permission or explanation. Unauthorised absence not only affects productivity but can also place strain on operations, staff morale, and service delivery.

However, while absenteeism can justify disciplinary action and even dismissal in certain cases, employers must always act within the framework of South African labour law. The Labour Relations Act (LRA) and the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA) set out clear principles of fairness that must be followed before any termination of employment takes place.

The key question is not simply whether an employee was absent, but rather whether the absence is serious enough, and handled correctly enough, to justify dismissal.

Employee Leave Rights and Responsibilities in South Africa

South African labour law provides employees with access to various forms of leave, including:

  • Annual leave
  • Sick leave
  • Family responsibility leave
  • Maternity leave
  • Unpaid leave (at the employer’s discretion)

These entitlements are governed mainly by the BCEA and are not unlimited or unconditional. Employees are required to follow company policies when applying for leave, which usually includes:

  • Submitting leave requests in advance where possible
  • Completing written leave application forms
  • Providing supporting documentation (such as medical certificates when required)
  • Waiting for approval before assuming leave is granted

A common misconception is that employees can take leave whenever they choose. In reality, leave must be requested and approved, and employers are entitled to manage operational requirements when considering such requests.

For example:

  • Annual leave is typically 15 working days per year for a standard five-day work week.
  • Sick leave is usually 30 working days over a three-year cycle.

Importantly, there is no automatic right to unpaid leave, and employers are not obliged to grant it.

What Happens When an Employee Stays Away Without Permission?

A frequent challenge arises when an employee’s leave request is refused, yet the employee remains absent from work regardless.

This type of conduct is considered unauthorised absence and may amount to misconduct. It reflects a failure to comply with workplace rules and may also undermine operational efficiency.

South African courts have confirmed that unauthorised absence can justify disciplinary action, particularly where it results in operational disruption or loss to the employer. However, dismissal is not automatic and must always be assessed in context.

The key considerations include:

  • The length of the absence
  • Whether the employee communicated with the employer
  • The impact on business operations
  • Whether the employee has a disciplinary record
  • Whether progressive discipline has been applied

Absenteeism, Abscondment and Desertion: What’s the Difference?

Employers must be careful not to treat all unexplained absences the same. The legal classification of the absence is important.

1. Absenteeism (AWOL)

Absenteeism generally refers to a short-term, unauthorised absence where the employee is expected to return.

For example:

  • An employee does not report for work for one or two days without notifying the employer.

This is usually treated as misconduct and is often addressed through warnings or disciplinary hearings.

2. Abscondment

Abscondment occurs when an employee is absent for an extended period without communication, creating uncertainty about whether they intend to return.

At this stage, the employer cannot assume resignation. Instead, the employer must actively attempt to establish contact and determine the employee’s intentions.

3. Desertion

Desertion is the most serious form of unauthorised absence and refers to situations where it can reasonably be concluded that the employee does not intend to return to work.

This conclusion is usually drawn from surrounding circumstances, such as:

  • Very long periods of unexplained absence
  • No communication with the employer despite attempts to contact the employee
  • Evidence that the employee has relocated or taken alternative employment

Even in cases of desertion, the employment relationship does not automatically end. The employer must still take steps to formally address the matter.

When Can Dismissal Be Considered?

Dismissal for absenteeism may be justified where:

  • The absence is repeated or prolonged
  • The employee ignores company procedures
  • The employer has issued prior warnings for similar conduct
  • The absence causes operational or financial harm
  • The employee fails to provide a reasonable explanation
  • Progressive discipline has not improved behaviour

However, dismissal must always be a last resort, not the first response.

The Importance of Progressive Discipline

Before moving to dismissal, employers should consider whether corrective action has been applied fairly and consistently.

This may include:

  • Informal counselling
  • Verbal warnings
  • Written warnings
  • Final written warnings

If the employee has not previously been disciplined for similar conduct, dismissal may be considered too harsh unless the misconduct is extremely serious.

South African labour law places strong emphasis on corrective discipline rather than punishment, especially for first-time or less serious offences.

What a Fair Process Looks Like

Before dismissing an employee for absenteeism, employers should:

  • Investigate the reason for the absence
  • Attempt to contact the employee
  • Request written explanations where possible
  • Issue formal notice of a disciplinary hearing
  • Allow the employee an opportunity to respond
  • Consider all mitigating and aggravating factors
  • Ensure the sanction is proportionate

Even if the employee does not attend the hearing, the employer must still proceed with a fair process in their absence.

Key Legal Principle: Fairness is Essential

The Labour Relations Act requires that every dismissal must be:

  • Substantively fair – there must be a valid reason
  • Procedurally fair – a proper process must be followed

This means that even where absenteeism is proven, dismissal may still be unfair if the employer fails to follow correct procedures or ignores relevant circumstances.

Conclusion

Yes, an employee can be dismissed for absenteeism in South Africa, but only under the right conditions and after a fair process has been followed.

Employers should always ensure that:

  • Leave policies are clear and consistently applied
  • Absence is properly investigated
  • The difference between absenteeism, abscondment, and desertion is understood
  • Progressive discipline is applied where appropriate
  • Dismissal is used only when it is fair and justified

Because every case depends on its specific facts, employers are strongly advised to seek professional labour law guidance before taking disciplinary action or terminating employment.

COFESA assists employers across South Africa with managing absenteeism, disciplinary hearings, and labour law compliance in a practical and legally sound manner.

Contact the COFESA Helpline to ensure correct and fair procedures are followed:

011 679 4373 | 082 888 9516 | helpline@cofesa.co.za

Become a COFESA member and gain access to expert labour law advice, compliance support, and representation when you need it most.Employer Cofesa membership join

The information provided in this Labour Law Questions & Answers Centre is intended for general informational purposes only and should not be regarded as legal advice, legal opinion, or a substitute for professional labour law consultation. While COFESA takes every reasonable step to ensure that the information published is accurate and up to date at the time of publication, South African labour legislation, case law, regulations and workplace circumstances may change over time.

Every employment matter is unique, and the appropriate course of action will depend on the specific facts, applicable legislation and relevant case law. Employers should avoid making disciplinary, dismissal, retrenchment or other employment decisions based solely on the information contained in these articles.

COFESA accepts no liability for any loss, damage or consequences arising from reliance on the information published in this Resource Centre without obtaining professional advice.

If you require guidance on a specific workplace matter, disciplinary hearing, dismissal, CCMA dispute, Employment Equity compliance, Occupational Health and Safety obligations or any other labour law issue, we recommend contacting COFESA directly for advice tailored to your circumstances.